Penalties and the Problem of Random Win or Loss: When the Lottery Decides the Fate of Champions

Imagine: one hundred and twenty minutes of intense battle, millions of fans in front of screens, players giving their all, and all of this is decided in mere seconds when one person sprints and kicks the ball from the eleven-meter line. Penalty. For some, it's a chance to become a hero, for others, a tragedy that haunts them for life. But how fair is this method of determining the winner? Is the penalty shootout a lottery that destroys the meaning of the game? Or is it the highest manifestation of psychological resilience and sportsmanship? Debates on this topic have been ongoing for decades, and every new tournament adds fresh arguments to them.

Historical Overview: How Penalties Became a Tool of Fate

Until the 1970s, draws in the playoffs were replayed, and sometimes a draw determined the fate of finalists. But in 1970, FIFA first introduced penalty shootouts at the World Cup. The first drama occurred in 1982 when West Germany defeated France in the semi-finals. Since then, penalties have become an integral part of big football. They have determined the winners of the Champions League, World Cup, and Europe Championship. And every time they raise the same questions: why should the outcome of such an important match be decided by a series of shots where elements of chance play a huge role?

History remembers famous cases when the best teams in the tournament were eliminated due to one unlucky penalty. Italy lost to Brazil in 1994 in the final when Roberto Baggio sent the ball into the sky. England suffered from the "curse of penalties" for decades, losing in decisive series. These episodes have entered football folklore and become part of national traumas. But they also sparked a discussion about how much chance determines the result.

Chance or Skill: What Do Statistics Say

Many experts claim that penalties are not roulette but an art based on technique, psychology, and preparation. Success depends on how calm the kicker is, how well they read the goalkeeper, and how they control their fear. However, statistics say otherwise. Studies show that on average, about 75% of penalties are scored, and this number has been quite stable over the decades. Moreover, the difference between the best and worst performers is not as great as one might expect. Elements of chance such as weather, field condition, player fatigue, and crowd pressure all contribute, making the series similar to a lottery.

But there is another perspective: in the penalty shootout, the character of the team and its psychological resilience are revealed. Teams that cope with pressure have an advantage. For example, Germany and Brazil have traditionally been strong in these series because their culture of preparation includes special penalty training and psychological work. However, they also have setbacks. Therefore, it cannot be said that it is entirely a matter of chance, but the element of uncertainty remains high.

The Psychological Factor: When Reason is Stronger than Technique

Players admit that penalties are the biggest psychological test in their careers. One kick can make you a hero or an outcast for life. Even the most technically skilled footballers sometimes cannot cope with the excitement. Remember the 2008 Champions League final when John Terry slipped at the decisive moment, or the 2022 World Cup final where Kylian Mbappé scored three penalties but his team still lost. These moments show that even with perfect technique, the fate of the kick often depends on the state of the nervous system.

Psychologists note that in the penalty shootout, it is more important not to be physically fit but to be able to turn off emotions and focus on a simple action. Players who can do this are more likely to become heroes. That's why coaches sometimes choose not the most star players for penalties but those with psychological resilience. However, even they are not immune to chance: the ball can hit the crossbar, the goalkeeper can guess the direction, and all calculations are shattered.

Alternatives to Penalties: What Has Been and Is Being Proposed

Due to dissatisfaction with the randomness of penalties, experts and fans have repeatedly proposed alternatives. For example, conducting additional time until the "golden goal" — when the first team to score wins immediately. However, this rule was canceled because it led to too cautious play. Also, it was proposed to increase substitutions in extra time or even conduct repeat matches. But all these options have their drawbacks: they overload players, complicate the calendar, or do not solve the problem of a draw. One of the most discussed ideas is the "American penalties" format — when the player starts from the center of the field and must circle the goalkeeper or score in an empty net. This is more spectacular and requires more skill than a standard shot from the spot. However, this format has not received support from FIFA. Also, it was proposed to change the distance to the goal or limit the time for preparing the shot. But all these ideas remain theory.

The Ethical Aspect: Is It Fair to Determine the Winner by Lottery

The main question that arises when discussing penalties is fairness. A team may dominate for 120 minutes, create many opportunities, but lose in the shootout. Should such an outcome be considered fair? Opponents of penalties claim that this is a profanation of the idea of sport, where the strongest wins. However, supporters argue that the ability to score penalties is also part of the game, and a team that is better prepared in this component deserves to win. In addition, penalties create inequality: the goalkeeper has fewer chances than the kicker, but their role in the series can be decisive. A good goalkeeper often becomes a hero, and their team gets an advantage. However, overall, the penalty shootout is still a lottery where luck plays too big a role. This does not satisfy many football romantics who want to see a more logical and understandable way to determine the winner.

Notable Cases When Penalties Decided Everything

The 1994 World Cup final — Brazil vs. Italy. Roberto Baggio, one of the best players in the world, sends the ball into the sky, and Brazil becomes the champion. The 2008 Champions League final — Manchester United vs. Chelsea. John Terry slips and does not score, and his team loses. The 2020 European Championship — England loses to Italy in the final, and the trophy goes to the opponents. These moments remain in history not only as sporting events but also as human dramas. They show that penalties are not just a technical element but a moment that determines the fate of players, coaches, and entire nations.

What to Do: Possible Reforms and Their Consequences

Some football federations have already experimented with changes. For example, in some tournaments, the rule has been introduced that in the penalty shootout, players kick in turn, but if one team scores and the other does not, it loses. This makes the series more intense, but it does not solve the problem of chance. Also, it was proposed to limit the time for preparing for a penalty to reduce psychological pressure, but this could lead to even more haste and mistakes. Perhaps the best solution will be a combination of factors: increasing extra time, using technology to accurately determine penalties, and finally, creating a more balanced scoring system. But for now, FIFA and UEFA are maintaining the traditional format, and we continue to witness dramas at the eleven-meter line.

Conclusion

Penalties are an integral part of football culture, combining skill and chance. They may be unfair, but they also create moments that are remembered for a lifetime. Without them, football would lose some of its charm. But the problem of chance remains, and it will be discussed as long as there are tournaments that end with a series of shots. Perhaps in the future, new formats will appear that make determining the winner more logical. But for now, we enjoy these dramas because they make football what it is — unpredictable, emotional, and wonderful.

Permanent link to this publication: