No Pensions for the Elderly: Where and Why Older People Lack Government Support

In most countries, retirement is a natural outcome of working life, a time of well-earned rest. However, there are many countries where the elderly cannot count on regular payments from the state. In some countries, there is no pension system at all, while in others it covers only a narrow circle of selected individuals—state employees, military personnel, or workers at large enterprises. The reasons for this phenomenon are diverse: from the complete collapse of state institutions to a deliberate choice of the contributory model. Let's look at where and why the elderly lack pension support.

Countries with a complete absence of a pension system

In some states, there is no pension at all for anyone. This is usually countries that have suffered from protracted wars, political instability, or the complete breakdown of state structures.

Somalia is a classic example. For decades, the central government has not been functioning, which has led to the complete collapse of all state institutions, including the social security system. The elderly are forced to rely solely on the support of relatives, local communities, and religious organizations.

South Sudan, the youngest state in the world, also lacks a pension system. The reason is a very weak state infrastructure and the total dominance of the informal sector, where the overwhelming majority of the population works. Without official employment, there are no insurance contributions, and therefore no pension funds.

In Afghanistan, the pension system effectively ceased to exist after the Taliban took power in 2021. In August 2025, payments resumed for some former state employees—military personnel, teachers, doctors, and police officers. However, farmers and other categories of citizens who did not have formal jobs have never had a right to a pension and remain without any support.

Yemen, Eritrea, Chad, the Central African Republic—are in these countries the pension system either does not function or covers such a narrow circle of people that it does not exist in practice for the overwhelming majority of the population.

Countries with pensions only for selected individuals

In some countries, pension payments are provided, but are only accessible to a limited category of citizens—usually state employees, military personnel, and workers in strategic sectors. The rest of the population remains without protection in old age.

In India, there is no concept of \"old-age pension\" as a universal payment. Regular subsidies are received only by state employees—this accounts for about 12 percent of the population. The main concern for the elderly falls on families and religious funds. The people of the country are forced to save for their old age on their own, otherwise they risk falling below the poverty line.

In China, a fragmented system has developed: pensions are available to state employees and workers at large urban enterprises. However, about 20 percent of the population, primarily rural residents, are not covered by any pension programs. The reason is the \"hukou\" registration system, which does not allow rural residents to legally work in cities and participate in social insurance.

In Vietnam and the Philippines, pension payments are provided only for those who worked for the state. In Vietnam, pensions are also received by urban residents and workers at industrial enterprises. In the Philippines, the system is facing serious financial difficulties—the deficit was so great that the president of the country had to sell his personal yacht to finance the payments.

In Pakistan and Iraq, pension payments are received only by state employees and workers in key sectors, such as oil extraction. The rest of the citizens remain without payments and rely on the support of their children and relatives.

In Bhutan, a contributory pension system formally exists, but it covers only state employees, military personnel, and employees of state-owned corporations—less than 10 percent of the population. The overwhelming majority of the inhabitants of this agricultural country remain without a pension. Some elderly people, especially those without relatives, find refuge in Buddhist monasteries.

Countries with a formal, but inefficient system

In some states, a pension system exists in theory, but real payments are received by only a few. In Niger, formally there is a pension system, but in fact payments are received by about three percent of the population. The average life expectancy here is 52 years, and only about five percent of the residents are legally employed. The high level of crime and the prevalence of the shadow economy make state subsidies inaccessible to most.

In Tanzania, there is no state pension at all—the minimum payments are provided only for military personnel and police officers. In Honduras, pensions, although small, are paid to everyone who has reached the age of 60, but few people live to that age—the result is that payments are received by only four percent of the citizens.

In Burkina Faso, Burundi, and Sierra Leone, social security is available only to officially employed citizens making regular contributions. In Burundi, for example, it takes at least 15 years of contributions to receive a pension. A large part of the population employed in agriculture, small trade, or casual work does not have social security, and therefore does not have the right to a pension.

Rich countries without universal pensions

The absence of universal old-age pensions is also encountered in prosperous economies. Luxembourg, one of the wealthiest countries in Europe, does not have a \"gift\" pension from the state. The amount of payments depends directly on the seniority and the amount of insurance contributions made by the employee and employer. The minimum pension with 40 years of seniority is about 2,165 euros. Monaco also uses the insurance model: to receive a pension, you need at least 10 years of official seniority and regular contributions from the salary. In these countries, the absence of universal pensions is not due to poverty, but an conscious choice in favor of the contributory system.

Why does this happen: main reasons

The reasons for the absence or limitation of pension systems can be divided into several key groups. The first and most obvious is extreme poverty and weak economy. The state simply does not have the financial resources to support all the elderly. This is characteristic of many countries in Africa and Asia.

The second reason is political instability and the collapse of institutions. In countries that have suffered from long-term civil wars, the state system of social security is destroyed.

The third reason is the dominance of the shadow economy. If the majority of the population works informally and does not pay insurance contributions, the pension system cannot be formed.

The fourth reason is demographic factors. In some countries, the average life expectancy is so low that people simply do not live to the age of retirement, and the system loses its meaning.

Finally, the fifth reason is an deliberate choice of the model. Some developed countries have abandoned the redistributive system in favor of the contributory one, where the pension depends only on the individual's contributions.

How the elderly survive without a pension

In countries without a pension system, the main support institution remains the family. Children and grandchildren take care of their elderly parents. In many cultures, this is seen not as a burden, but as a natural obligation. Religious and community structures also play an important role—they organize assistance, shelters, and food for the needy. In some cases, the elderly receive humanitarian aid from international organizations. However, these measures are often insufficient, and many seniors are forced to continue working into old age to survive.

Conclusion

The pension system is not a universal phenomenon. In some countries around the world, it does not exist or does not perform its function. Sometimes this is a consequence of poverty and the weakness of the state, sometimes—political instability, and sometimes—a deliberate choice in favor of contributory mechanisms. In these countries, the elderly depend on their families, charity, and personal savings. Understanding this reality is important not only for travelers, but also for understanding how diverse the models of social protection can be in the modern world.
© library.tz

Permanent link to this publication: