The question of the "most peaceful president" contains a value judgment that historical science, as a strict discipline, avoids. The concept of "pacifism" can be interpreted in different ways: as a rejection of war, prioritizing diplomacy, reducing military spending, refraining from military intervention in the affairs of other countries, or successfully resolving internal conflicts. Moreover, historical evaluation depends on the context of the era, available sources, and perspective.

Instead of seeking a single "most peaceful," let's consider several distinguished leaders from the history of North and South America whose policies and legacies are most consistently associated with pacifism, disarmament, and a refusal to engage in military aggression. Their examples allow us to see different models of "pacifism" in action.

1. José Figueres Ferrer (Costa Rica)

Term of office: 1948–1949, 1953–1958, 1970–1974.

Argument for pacifism: Figueres took a truly revolutionary step of unprecedented character in world history. On December 1, 1948, as acting president after the civil war, he symbolically destroyed the walls of the military barracks "Cuartel Bellavista" and announced the abolition of the army as a state institution. This act was enshrined in the Costa Rican Constitution of 1949 (Article 12). Since then, the country has managed with only police and border guard forces.

Context and achievements:

The decision was both symbolic and pragmatic: the funds saved on the army were redirected to education, healthcare, and environmental protection. Today, Costa Rica is one of the most stable democracies in the region with high social standards.

Figueres became a key mediator in resolving regional conflicts and an active advocate for the creation of the United Nations University for Peace, which is now located in San José.

His legacy — Costa Rica as a unarmed nation — remains the most vivid and consistent example of state pacifism in the Western Hemisphere.

2. Juan Manuel Santos (Colombia)

Term of office: 2010–2018.

Argument for pacifism: Santos showed exceptional political courage by initiating and concluding a peace process with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), the longest and bloodiest guerrilla movement in the Americas. The conflict lasted over 50 years and took the lives of more than 260,000 people.

Context and achievements:

Santos, who had previously served as Minister of Defense and led military operations against the FARC, decisively changed strategy, moving from military pressure to complex negotiations in Havana.

Despite fierce opposition from political opponents (led by his predecessor Álvaro Uribe) and the risk to his own popularity, he brought the process to a successful conclusion. The historic peace agreement was signed in 2016.

In 2016, Juan Manuel Santos was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize with the wording "for his decisive efforts to end more than 50 years of civil war in the country." The prize recognized his role in ending the internal war, not just his refusal to engage in external aggression.

3. Jimmy Carter (United States of America)

Term of office: 1977–1981.

Argument for pacifism: Although his presidency was controversial in terms of domestic economy, his foreign policy was imbued with ideas of human rights, arms control, and peacekeeping diplomacy.

Context and achievements:

Camp David Accords (1978): Carter's personal, persistent, and risky mediation between Anwar Sadat (Egypt) and Menachem Begin (Israel) led to the first peace treaty in history between Israel and an Arab state.

Panama Treaties: Ensured a peaceful transfer of control over the Panama Canal from the United States to Panama, eliminating a long-standing source of tension in the region.

Priority of human rights: Made the protection of human rights a key element of U.S. foreign policy, which often cooled relations with authoritarian allies but created a new moral imperative.

Post-presidency: His work at the Carter Center for Election Observation, Disease Eradication, and Peacekeeping strengthened his reputation as one of the most significant peacekeepers of the 20th–21st centuries, recognized by the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002.

Comparative Analysis and Conclusions

Figueres represents radical institutional pacifism — the refusal to wage war at all through the abolition of the army.

Santos embodies bold peacemaking in an internal conflict — the willingness to make compromises to end the civil war.

Carter demonstrates ethical diplomacy and mediation as the foundation of foreign policy, placing peace above short-term strategic gains.

Interesting fact: The mentioned act of Figueres on the dissolution of the army is not only unique but also economically efficient. According to the Global Peace Index, Costa Rica has been among the safest and most peaceful countries in Latin America for decades, spending less than 0.5% of GDP on defense (compared to the global average of about 2.2%).

Thus, the question of the "most peaceful president" does not have a single correct answer. However, José Figueres Ferrer, with his decisive and irreversible institutional reform, made the most uncompromising and symbolically powerful act, making peace not just a policy but a cornerstone of his country's statehood. His example remains unique not only for the Americas but for the world as a whole. Santos and Carter, in turn, showed how peacemaking can manifest itself in the most complex and seemingly hopeless conflicts of modernity.

Permanent link to this publication: