Combating corruption in football

Workaholism as an escape from life

Best airplane parks and airports in the world

Combating lying in court

What Lenin said about the Internet

Lenin and the Internet — Analysis of Fake Quotations and Folkloric Myths

Lenin with Wi-Fi: How the Internet Could Rewrite 1917

All U.S. presidential visits to China — full chronology

Roman law: the foundation of modern jurisprudence

Origin, versions, and modern meaning of the word that sends shivers down some people's spines while others say it with a smile

Why the Rockefellers live to 100: the founder's regimen, a vegetable-based diet, multiple heart transplants, and lifestyle.

This article examines the phenomenon of so-called "one-year seeds" — seeds that produce a crop only in the first generation and cannot be used for subsequent sowing. Based on an analysis of the history of Genetic Use Restriction Technology (GURT), known as "Terminator Technology," as well as F1 hybrid seeds currently available on the market, the article reconstructs the actual picture of which seeds truly require annual purchase and why. Particular attention is devoted to distinguishing myths from facts: no agricultural corporation in the world has commercialized genetically modified sterile seeds, yet F1 hybrid seeds, widely available on the market, are biologically unsuitable for seed saving. For Ukraine's agricultural sector, where farmers annually face a choice between the productivity of hybrids and the cost savings of traditional varieties, understanding these mechanisms holds special practical significance.

This article examines the systemic threats that the activities of Palantir Technologies pose to human rights, civil liberties, and democratic institutions worldwide. Based on analysis of public reports from human rights organizations, lawsuits, journalistic investigations, and official statements, the multifaceted picture of risks associated with the implementation of mass surveillance and data analysis technologies is reconstructed. Particular attention is devoted to three key areas of criticism: complicity in Israel's war crimes in the Gaza Strip, facilitation of mass deportation of migrants in the United States, and the creation of total police control systems in Europe.

This article examines the systemic threats posed by Palantir Technologies' activities to human rights, civil liberties, and democratic institutions worldwide. Based on an analysis of public reports by human rights organizations, lawsuits, journalistic investigations, and official statements, a multifaceted picture of the risks associated with the deployment of mass surveillance and data analytics technologies is reconstructed. Special attention is paid to three key areas of criticism: complicity in Israel's war crimes in the Gaza Strip, aiding the mass deportation of migrants in the United States, and the creation of systems of total police surveillance in Europe.